Termination proof of /tmp/tmpYF4gXT/01.itrs

Termination of the given ITRSProblem could not be shown:

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

ITRS problem:
The following domains are used:

z

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Cond_eval(TRUE, x, y) → eval(-@z(x, 1@z), y)
eval(x, y) → Cond_eval(>@z(x, y), x, y)

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(TRUE, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)

Represented integers and predefined function symbols by Terms

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Cond_eval(true, x, y) → eval(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
eval(x, y) → Cond_eval(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), neg(y)) → minus_nat(y, x)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → pos(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

Using Dependency Pairs [AG00,LPAR04] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → MINUS_INT(x, pos(s(0)))
EVAL(x, y) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
EVAL(x, y) → GREATER_INT(x, y)
MINUS_INT(pos(x), pos(y)) → MINUS_NAT(x, y)
MINUS_INT(neg(x), neg(y)) → MINUS_NAT(y, x)
MINUS_INT(neg(x), pos(y)) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)
MINUS_INT(pos(x), neg(y)) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)
PLUS_NAT(s(x), y) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)
MINUS_NAT(s(x), s(y)) → MINUS_NAT(x, y)
GREATER_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(pos(x), pos(y))
GREATER_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Cond_eval(true, x, y) → eval(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
eval(x, y) → Cond_eval(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), neg(y)) → minus_nat(y, x)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → pos(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → MINUS_INT(x, pos(s(0)))
EVAL(x, y) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
EVAL(x, y) → GREATER_INT(x, y)
MINUS_INT(pos(x), pos(y)) → MINUS_NAT(x, y)
MINUS_INT(neg(x), neg(y)) → MINUS_NAT(y, x)
MINUS_INT(neg(x), pos(y)) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)
MINUS_INT(pos(x), neg(y)) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)
PLUS_NAT(s(x), y) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)
MINUS_NAT(s(x), s(y)) → MINUS_NAT(x, y)
GREATER_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(pos(x), pos(y))
GREATER_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Cond_eval(true, x, y) → eval(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
eval(x, y) → Cond_eval(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), neg(y)) → minus_nat(y, x)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → pos(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 5 SCCs with 6 less nodes.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATER_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Cond_eval(true, x, y) → eval(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
eval(x, y) → Cond_eval(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), neg(y)) → minus_nat(y, x)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → pos(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATER_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATER_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the usable rules with reduction pair processor [LPAR04] with a polynomial ordering [POLO], all dependency pairs and the corresponding usable rules [FROCOS05] can be oriented non-strictly. All non-usable rules are removed, and those dependency pairs and usable rules that have been oriented strictly or contain non-usable symbols in their left-hand side are removed as well.

The following dependency pairs can be deleted:

GREATER_INT(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(neg(x), neg(y))

No rules are removed from R.

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(GREATER_INT(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(neg(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 2·x₁

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATER_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(pos(x), pos(y))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Cond_eval(true, x, y) → eval(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
eval(x, y) → Cond_eval(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), neg(y)) → minus_nat(y, x)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → pos(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATER_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(pos(x), pos(y))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

GREATER_INT(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → GREATER_INT(pos(x), pos(y))

No rules are removed from R.

Used ordering: POLO with Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(GREATER_INT(x₁, x₂)) = 2·x₁ + x₂
POL(pos(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 2·x₁

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ UsableRulesReductionPairsProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS_NAT(s(x), s(y)) → MINUS_NAT(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Cond_eval(true, x, y) → eval(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
eval(x, y) → Cond_eval(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), neg(y)) → minus_nat(y, x)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → pos(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS_NAT(s(x), s(y)) → MINUS_NAT(x, y)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

MINUS_NAT(s(x), s(y)) → MINUS_NAT(x, y)

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

MINUS_NAT(s(x), s(y)) → MINUS_NAT(x, y)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 > 2

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS_NAT(s(x), y) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Cond_eval(true, x, y) → eval(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
eval(x, y) → Cond_eval(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), neg(y)) → minus_nat(y, x)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → pos(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS_NAT(s(x), y) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPSizeChangeProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PLUS_NAT(s(x), y) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)

From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:

PLUS_NAT(s(x), y) → PLUS_NAT(x, y)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1, 2 >= 2

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(x, y) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

Cond_eval(true, x, y) → eval(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
eval(x, y) → Cond_eval(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), neg(y)) → minus_nat(y, x)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_int(pos(x), neg(y)) → pos(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(x, y) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(x, y) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
In the following pairs the term without variables pos(s(0)) is replaced by the fresh variable x_removed.
Pair: COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
Positions in right side of the pair:

[0,1]

The new variable was added to all pairs as a new argument[CONREM].

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                          ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(x, y, x_removed) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y, x_removed)
COND_EVAL(true, x, y, x_removed) → EVAL(minus_int(x, x_removed), y, x_removed)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

[0,1]

The new variable was added to all pairs as a new argument[CONREM].

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                          ↳ QDP

                        ↳ Narrowing

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(x, y, x_removed) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y, x_removed)
COND_EVAL(true, x, y, x_removed) → EVAL(minus_int(x, x_removed), y, x_removed)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [LPAR04] the rule EVAL(x, y) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(neg(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(neg(0), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(0), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, pos(0), neg(0))
EVAL(neg(0), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(0), neg(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(0), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, pos(0), pos(0))
EVAL(neg(0), pos(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(0), pos(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(false, pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(neg(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(neg(0), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(0), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, pos(0), neg(0))
EVAL(neg(0), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(0), neg(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(0), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, pos(0), pos(0))
EVAL(neg(0), pos(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(false, neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(0), pos(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(false, pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 9 less nodes.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
EVAL(neg(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)
EVAL(neg(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [LPAR04] the rule COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(x0), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, s(0)), y1)
COND_EVAL(true, neg(x0), y1) → EVAL(neg(plus_nat(x0, s(0))), y1)

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(neg(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(x0), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, s(0)), y1)
COND_EVAL(true, neg(x0), y1) → EVAL(neg(plus_nat(x0, s(0))), y1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 2 SCCs.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, neg(x0), y1) → EVAL(neg(plus_nat(x0, s(0))), y1)
EVAL(neg(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, neg(x0), y1) → EVAL(neg(plus_nat(x0, s(0))), y1)
EVAL(neg(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                            ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, neg(x0), y1) → EVAL(neg(plus_nat(x0, s(0))), y1)
EVAL(neg(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [LPAR04] the rule COND_EVAL(true, neg(x0), y1) → EVAL(neg(plus_nat(x0, s(0))), y1) at position [0,0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, neg(s(x0)), y1) → EVAL(neg(s(plus_nat(x0, s(0)))), y1)
COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), y1) → EVAL(neg(s(0)), y1)

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(neg(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
COND_EVAL(true, neg(s(x0)), y1) → EVAL(neg(s(plus_nat(x0, s(0)))), y1)
COND_EVAL(true, neg(0), y1) → EVAL(neg(s(0)), y1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ Instantiation

                                            ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, neg(s(x0)), y1) → EVAL(neg(s(plus_nat(x0, s(0)))), y1)
EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule COND_EVAL(true, neg(s(x0)), y1) → EVAL(neg(s(plus_nat(x0, s(0)))), y1) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, neg(s(z0)), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(neg(s(plus_nat(z0, s(0)))), neg(s(z1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ Instantiation

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
COND_EVAL(true, neg(s(z0)), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(neg(s(plus_nat(z0, s(0)))), neg(s(z1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as they contain symbols which do neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ Instantiation

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ MNOCProof

                                            ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
COND_EVAL(true, neg(s(z0)), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(neg(s(plus_nat(z0, s(0)))), neg(s(z1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the modular non-overlap check [FROCOS05] to decrease Q to the empty set.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ Instantiation

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ MNOCProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(neg(x0), neg(x1)), neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
COND_EVAL(true, neg(s(z0)), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(neg(s(plus_nat(z0, s(0)))), neg(s(z1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(x0), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, s(0)), y1)
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))
minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(x0), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, s(0)), y1)
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(x0), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, s(0)), y1)
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [LPAR04] the rule COND_EVAL(true, pos(x0), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, s(0)), y1) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, 0), y1)
COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), y1) → EVAL(neg(s(0)), y1)

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(0), neg(s(x0))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, 0), y1)
COND_EVAL(true, pos(0), y1) → EVAL(neg(s(0)), y1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 2 less nodes.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, 0), y1)
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, 0), y1)
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By narrowing [LPAR04] the rule COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), y1) → EVAL(minus_nat(x0, 0), y1) at position [0] we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(0)), y1) → EVAL(pos(0), y1)
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), y1) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), y1)

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(0)), y1) → EVAL(pos(0), y1)
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), y1) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), y1)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), y1) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), y1)
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), y1) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), y1)
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), y1) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), y1)
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By instantiating [LPAR04] the rule COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), y1) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), y1) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(z1)))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(z1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(z1)))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(z1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 4 SCCs.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(0)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                                            ↳ MRRProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By using the rule removal processor [LPAR04] with the following ordering, at least one Dependency Pair or term rewrite system rule of this QDP problem can be strictly oriented.
Strictly oriented dependency pairs:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), neg(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(0))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(COND_EVAL(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(EVAL(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(neg(x₁)) = x₁
POL(pos(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 2 + x₁
POL(true) = 0

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                                            ↳ MRRProof

                                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                                ↳ PisEmptyProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(0))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(0))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(0)) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), pos(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(0))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                                            ↳ MRRProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(0)) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(0))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), pos(0)) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(0))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(COND_EVAL(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(EVAL(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(pos(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 2 + x₁
POL(true) = 0

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                                            ↳ MRRProof

                                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                                ↳ PisEmptyProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(z1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(z1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

R is empty.
The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(z1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1))) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(z1)))
EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(s(x1)))

R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), neg(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(z1))) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), neg(s(x1))) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                                            ↳ MRRProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(s(x1)))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), neg(s(x1))) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), neg(s(x1)))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(COND_EVAL(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = x₁ + x₂ + x₃
POL(EVAL(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(neg(x₁)) = x₁
POL(pos(x₁)) = x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 2 + x₁
POL(true) = 0

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                                            ↳ MRRProof

                                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                                ↳ PisEmptyProof

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(z1)))
EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(x0), pos(x1)), pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1))) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(s(y_1)), pos(x1)), pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(z1)))
EVAL(pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(s(y_1)), pos(x1)), pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
By forward instantiating [JAR06] the rule COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(x0))), pos(s(z1))) → EVAL(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(z1))) we obtained the following new rules [LPAR04]:

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), pos(s(x1))) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(s(x1)))

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(s(y_1)), pos(x1)), pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1)))
COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), pos(s(x1))) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(s(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [LPAR04].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

COND_EVAL(true, pos(s(s(s(y_0)))), pos(s(x1))) → EVAL(pos(s(s(y_0))), pos(s(x1)))

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(s(y_1)), pos(x1)), pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1)))

Used ordering: Polynomial interpretation [POLO]:

POL(0) = 0
POL(COND_EVAL(x₁, x₂, x₃)) = 1 + x₂ + x₃
POL(EVAL(x₁, x₂)) = 1 + x₁ + x₂
POL(false) = 0
POL(greater_int(x₁, x₂)) = 0
POL(pos(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(s(x₁)) = 1 + x₁
POL(true) = 0

The following usable rules [FROCOS05] were oriented: none

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ RemovalProof

                        ↳ Narrowing

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ Narrowing

                                      ↳ QDP

                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                          ↳ AND

                                            ↳ QDP

                                            ↳ QDP

                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                ↳ QDP

                                                  ↳ QReductionProof

                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                      ↳ Narrowing

                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                              ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                  ↳ Narrowing

                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                        ↳ QDP

                                                                          ↳ UsableRulesProof

                                                                            ↳ QDP

                                                                              ↳ QReductionProof

                                                                                ↳ QDP

                                                                                  ↳ Instantiation

                                                                                    ↳ QDP

                                                                                      ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                                                                                        ↳ AND

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                          ↳ QDP

                                                                                            ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                              ↳ QDP

                                                                                                ↳ ForwardInstantiation

                                                                                                  ↳ QDP

                                                                                                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                                                                                      ↳ QDP

                                                                                                        ↳ DependencyGraphProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1))) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(pos(s(y_1)), pos(x1)), pos(s(s(y_1))), pos(s(x1)))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LPAR04,FROCOS05,EDGSTAR] contains 0 SCCs with 1 less node.
As all Q-normal forms are R-normal forms we are in the innermost case. Hence, by the usable rules processor [LPAR04] we can delete all non-usable rules [FROCOS05] from R.

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(x, y) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)
minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted the following terms from Q as each root-symbol of these terms does neither occur in P nor in R.[THIEMANN].

Cond_eval(true, x0, x1)
eval(x0, x1)

↳ ITRS

  ↳ ITRStoQTRSProof

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                ↳ UsableRulesProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QReductionProof

                      ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

EVAL(x, y) → COND_EVAL(greater_int(x, y), x, y)
COND_EVAL(true, x, y) → EVAL(minus_int(x, pos(s(0))), y)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus_int(pos(x), pos(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
minus_int(neg(x), pos(y)) → neg(plus_nat(x, y))
plus_nat(0, x) → x
plus_nat(s(x), y) → s(plus_nat(x, y))
minus_nat(0, 0) → pos(0)
minus_nat(0, s(y)) → neg(s(y))
minus_nat(s(x), 0) → pos(s(x))
minus_nat(s(x), s(y)) → minus_nat(x, y)
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(0)) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(0)) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → true
greater_int(neg(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → false
greater_int(pos(s(x)), pos(s(y))) → greater_int(pos(x), pos(y))
greater_int(neg(s(x)), neg(s(y))) → greater_int(neg(x), neg(y))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

minus_int(pos(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), neg(x1))
minus_int(neg(x0), pos(x1))
minus_int(pos(x0), neg(x1))
plus_nat(0, x0)
plus_nat(s(x0), x1)
minus_nat(0, 0)
minus_nat(0, s(x0))
minus_nat(s(x0), 0)
minus_nat(s(x0), s(x1))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), pos(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(neg(0), neg(s(x0)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(0))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(pos(s(x0)), pos(s(x1)))
greater_int(neg(s(x0)), neg(s(x1)))

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.